AI Simulation Workspace
đŽ Simulation Control Center
4 simulations running
35%
Peak Demand Simulation
Running
73% Complete
Iterations:
7,340 / 10,000
ETA:
4 minutes
Equipment Failure Analysis
Completed
Impact:
-42% throughput
Recovery:
8.4 hours
Optimization Model
Paused
45% Complete
Seasonal Forecast
Queued
Position in queue: #2
Estimated start: 12 minutes
Simulation Results: Peak Demand Impact
Scenario Comparison
Current State
Efficiency:
87.3%
Throughput:
2,450 units/day
Cost:
$32.75/unit
Optimized Scenario
Efficiency:
92.1% (+4.8%)
Throughput:
3,050 units/day (+24.5%)
Cost:
$29.40/unit (-10.2%)
Worst Case
Efficiency:
64.2% (-23.1%)
Throughput:
1,820 units/day (-25.7%)
Cost:
$41.20/unit (+25.8%)
Monte Carlo Simulation Results
| Scenario | Iterations | Confidence | Best Case | Expected | Worst Case | Risk Level | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Peak Demand Response | 10,000 | 96.4% | +34% efficiency | +24.7% efficiency | +12% efficiency | Low | đ Implement |
| Equipment Redundancy | 15,000 | 94.1% | +18% reliability | +12.3% reliability | -2% reliability | Medium | â ī¸ Review |
| Workforce Flexibility | 8,500 | 91.7% | +28% adaptability | +19.2% adaptability | +8% adaptability | Low | đ¯ Deploy |
| Process Automation | 12,000 | 87.3% | +45% productivity | +31.5% productivity | -8% productivity | High | đ¨ Assess |
Simulation History
Q4 Capacity Planning
Result: +18% efficiency gain identified
Equipment Failure Impact
Result: Backup strategy ROI $47K
Demand Surge Analysis
Result: Resource allocation optimized